Girl with a Pearl Earring

I finally got around to seeing Girl with a Pearl Earring tonight with Kathleen and a friend. I wasn’t sure what to expect. On one hand, Ebert loved it and I love me some Colin Firth. On the other hand, Scarlett Johansson has been annoying the crap out of me lately. Luckily my Mr. Darcy fixation won out. It’s a wonderful film. Slow, yes, but not boring and not overly melodramatic. Tom Wilkinson made a wonderful villain in his few scenes. The cinematography was lovely; every shot looked like a painting. Scarlett completely made me forget how vapid and shallow she is in real life. I highly recommend it if you’re in the mood for something a little different.

Random Fates Intersecting: I was reading Bill Bryson’s A Short History of Nearly Everything just last night and came to a footnote about Vermeer in the chapter about microscopes. Bryson mentions that some art historians believe Vermeer “cheated” by using a camera obscura provided by his friend Anton van Leeuwenhoek. It’s a bit of a conspiracy theory, though, so I didn’t expect it to be mentioned in the film. But there it was! Some guys bring in a big wooden box and Vermeer shows Griet how it works. It wasn’t integral to the story or anything – and he only admitted that it “helped” with the paintings – but I was still surprised that they worked it in.

Comments

2 responses to “Girl with a Pearl Earring”

  1. Jenny

    I agree. It’s definitely not the movie to see after the mexican restaurant we lunched at gave us complimentary tequila shots b/c apparently the pitcher of margaritas we split wasn’t quite enough. Although I did enjoy it. And I loooove me some Colin Firth, also. And you’re right about Scarlett – she pulled it off.

  2. Kathleen

    It’s grey and horrible today – might just stay in and watch Pride and Prejudice again and get some more of that Colin Firth – fwaaaarrr! Hey, and on a side note, you know how we were talking about David Wenham and his movie The Bank? – well it’s on tonight (Sunday)!! It’s brilliant!!


Important Note

This site features content going all the way back to 2000. The posts you’ll read reflect my views and writing style at the time. While I have gone back to clean up a few of them, I think it’s important not to sanitise too much. This site is a record of who I am and how I’ve grown. Any blog post written years ago may not reflect who I am today, nor how I would write about the same topic today.