In case there was any doubt at all, this picture clearly reestablishes Renee Zellweger as my nemesis. She’s just too friggin’ gawky and weird right now.
Important Note
This site features content going all the way back to 2000. The posts you’ll read reflect my views and writing style at the time. While I have gone back to clean up a few of them, I think it’s important not to sanitise too much. This site is a record of who I am and how I’ve grown. Any blog post written years ago may not reflect who I am today, nor how I would write about the same topic today.
Comments
5 responses to “Zellweger”
It’s funny that you mention this, cuz last night my husband (hee!) and I discussed Renee’s transformation from cute and bubbly, to walking Health class skeleton. I think she looked so much better when she played Bridget Jones, and she had some weight on her. She looked softer, more feminine, and definitely more healthy.
But that’s just my 2 cents. I think she still has the whole flat-chested, gaunt, 1920’s flapper-girl look going from Chicago.
I saw Chicago last week and didn’t even know it was the same person. Her role was great but her health looks poor.
I think she had that look before Chicago, Moire. She went straight to that after Bridget Jones. The British tabloids, who had been so in love with her during the filming of BJD, started calling her Bridget Bones and running unflattering pictures of her. I don’t blame ’em.
LOL!! Good lord! What’s happened to her?
And what about Nicole Kidman? What the hell’s gone on there? She looks about 50, and her legs are all weird.
Man, I’m being a little snarky today. 😉
Oh lord. And check out this picture. Could she look any faker or smarmier?