2 thoughts on “64=65?”

  1. At the risk of getting completely geeky, it occurs to me that this is going to work with any three successive numbers in the Fibonacci sequence (e.g. rearranging an 8*21 rectangle into a 13*13 square) with the gap getting proportionately tinier and the “proof” more convincing as you climb the sequence. The Golden Section pops up again…

Comments are closed.